Nephi Anderson’s first novel, Added Upon (1898), may not be the best Mormon novel, but it has an
important place in Mormon literary and cultural history. As one of the first
Mormon novels, it was groundbreaking in its exciting—even epic—fusion of
theology and popular culture. Through it, Mormon literary critic Michael Austin
points out, Nephi Anderson “[opened] a door to imaginative literature within
the Mormon community” and helped Mormons “[learn], in a very real sense, not to
be afraid of fiction” (13).
Marcus King, Mormon
(1900), Anderson’s second novel, enjoys a less exalted place in Mormon memory.
Unlike its predecessor, it is a historical novel that limits its narrative
scope to the drama of a few American characters in their second estates.
Marcus, the novel’s namesake, is a Presbyterian minister who renounces the
pulpit, converts to Mormonism, and travels west with the pioneers. Young,
intelligent, and morally courageous, he is a typical Andersonian protagonist.
With truth as his polar star, he endures with unshakable faith the rejection of his congregation, the
hardships of a handcart crossing, and the trials of love. Like a character in a Greek romance, his locations change frequently while
his character stays the same. The challenges Marcus faces, therefore, constitute
and ordeal that “shatters nothing and forges nothing” in
the character, as Bahktin would argue, but “merely tries the durability of an already finished product”
(104-107).
This unwavering commitment to his conversion, admittedly,
lessens Marcus’ appeal for readers who demand characters with complex
interiorities and regular crises of faith. Like Added Upon, Marcus King,
Mormon is proxy fiction that asks readers to place themselves in the
narrative and experience various ordeals as if they themselves were the
protagonist. Anderson, therefore, keeps Marcus as uncomplicated and universal
as possible. While he is not a blank slate, without body, parts, or passions,
Marcus is generic enough—and his life experiences broad enough—to stand in for
any turn-of-the-century Mormon (or potentially Mormon) boy. In this respect,
Marcus is somewhat Algeresque, although his ordeal, unlike Ragged Dick’s,
carries him from the riches of priestcraft to the rags of a consecrated life.
Quaint though it may seem today, Marcus King, Mormon is not a bad novel compared to other popular
works of its time. Writing in a sentimental fashion, Anderson fills the novel
with stock characters, unlikely coincidences, melodramatic love triangles, and
fainting. Though predictable, it reflects a sincere attempt to mainstream
Mormonism for a Mormon community that was becoming increasingly assimilated to American
ways. More importantly, it serves as a nice example of how early Mormon writers
appropriated the novel—a literary form that was, in Anderson’s day, commonly
used to promote an anti-Mormon agenda—and shaped it to respond artistically to their critics. Indeed, like other Andersonian protagonists,
Marcus is the antithesis of the oversexed brutes founds in the salacious
anti-Mormon novels of the late nineteenth century. Rather than lording over
women and murdering apostates, Marcus pursues women only reluctantly and treats
apostates with sympathy and forbearance.
Among the more puzzling aspects of the novel is its
historical setting. Known best for his stories about post-Manifesto Mormons,
Anderson nevertheless dabbled in historical fiction on occasion. Marcus King, Mormon takes place in the
late 1850s, yet readers would not know this were it not for handcarts, a
paragraph about the Utah War, and a cameo by Brigham Young. Indeed, history seemingly plays
such a peripheral role in the novel that readers are bound to
question why Anderson even bothered to situate Marcus’ story in time. Possibly,
the historical setting is meant to accentuates the gravity of Marcus’ trials, which happen
against the backdrop of one of the most tumultuous decades in
nineteenth-century Mormon and American history. Aside from the Utah War, both
Bleeding Kansas and John Brown’s Raid are alluded to in the novel, suggesting a
possible parallel between Marcus’ ordeal and those of Mormonism and the United
States respectively. Also, the historical setting allows Anderson to further
mythologize the Mormon past and instill a sense of collective heritage and
identity in his readers, many of whom were likely born after the Mormon pioneer
era had ended.
Of course, with the historical setting comes the problem of
polygamy. As a post-Manifesto novel that borrows heavily from the strictly
monogamous conventions of sentimental fiction, Marcus King, Mormon deals with the realities of 1850s Mormon
sexuality in a circumspect way. Images
of Mormon polygamy are absent, for example, and Marcus remains celibate almost
to the very end of the novel, although Brigham Young does counsel him midway through “to
get a wife, or two […] as soon as possible” (114). Marcus, to be sure, flirts with the
possibility of a polygamous marriage; however, when he finally “[gets] two wives
in one day,” he does so in a way that in no way subverts the turn-of-the-century
Mormon reader’s new commitment to monogamy (203).
In his analysis of Marcus
King, Mormon, Richard H. Cracroft rightly argues that it is “an interesting attempt
to examine personal sacrifice on an individual and collective level” (7). I also think the novel is a continuation of the project Anderson began with Added Upon. Indeed, if Added Upon is “an effort to give in
brief an outline of the ‘scheme of things’ […] as taught by the Gospel of
Christ and believed in by the Latter-day Saints,” as Anderson suggests it is in
the preface to the third edition of the novel, then Marcus King, Mormon is a case study of how a knowledge of the ‘scheme
of things’ affects everyday lives. Marcus, after all, is not so much concerned
with becoming a god in heaven as he is with being a saint on earth. “The
highest type of personal holiness,” he tells a non-Mormon friend,
is not attained in the cloister, but
out in the thick of the world’s temptations, battling with sin and error, gaining
experience by what we suffer, overcoming, conquering. There is opportunity enough
for self-denial, self-renunciation in our daily lives. A man can be a man and a
saint at the same time. Manhood, womanhood, and sainthood are synonyms. (158)
Such words of wisdom ground Marcus King, Mormon in the realities of its protagonist’s mortal
probation. Certainly, what the novel lacks in popularity and cultural
significance, it makes up for in its earnest commitment to the power of true conversion
and moral courage.
Works Cited
Anderson, Nephi. “Preface
to the Third Edition.” Added Upon.
1898. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1939. Print.
---. Marcus King, Mormon. Salt Lake City:
George Q. Cannon & Sons Company, 1900. Print.
Austin, Michael. “Mormon
Home Literature.” Sunstone 21.4 (Dec.
1998): 12-13. Print.
Bahktin, M. M. “Forms
of Time and Chronotope in the Novel.” The
Dialogic Imagination. Ed. Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981.
84-258. Print.
Cracroft, Richard
H. “Nephi, Seer of Modern Times: The Home Literature Novels of Nephi Anderson.”
BYU Studies 25.2 (1985): 1-13. Print.